Former Department of Justice official to tell Congress that prosecutors faced improper political interference.
The federal office that led the prosecution of President Donald Trump’s friend Roger Stone received “heavy pressure from the highest levels of the Department of Justice” to ease its sentencing recommendation, career prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky plans to tell Congress, according to his prepared remarks.
Zelinsky, who withdrew from the Roger Stone case in protest, will testify on Wednesday before the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives Judiciary Committee about political pressures that he said the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia faced.
He will add that Tim Shea, the acting US attorney at the time – who was appointed by Attorney General William Barr, ultimately caved to the pressure because he was “afraid of the President”.
Zelinsky’s testimony never explicitly said who pressured Shea, but he said he was told that Shea “was receiving heavy pressure from the highest levels of the Department of Justice to cut Stone a break”.
“I was explicitly told that the motivation for changing the sentencing memo was political, and because the US Attorney was ‘afraid of the President’,” Zelinsky said.
The Justice Department had no immediate comment on his testimony.
Republicans are expected to push back on his testimony, saying he is confusing politicisation with policy disagreements.
Zelinsky said career prosecutors never got to see the draft of the revised memo, which Shea filed after Trump blasted the office on Twitter for its original recommendation of a seven-to-nine-year term.
The Republican president called the recommendation “horrible” and a “miscarriage of justice”. Stone’s friendship with Trump dates back decades.
Stone, 67, who was convicted of obstruction, witness tampering and lying to Congress during its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, is due to report to prison later this month to begin serving his three years-and-four-month sentence. He is seeking an extension due to concerns about contracting COVID-19.
Wednesday’s hearing will mark the first time that Zelinsky will publicly discuss the drama that ensued behind the scenes with the case, in what critics see as part of a broader pattern of improper political interference by the attorney general in the criminal justice system.
He also said an antitrust probe of the four carmakers began the day after Trump tweeted on August 21 that he was angered that the companies were negotiating with California about air quality emissions standards.
The investigation had the effect of deterring other carmakers from joining the voluntary California agreements.
The Justice Department did not have any immediate comment on the antitrust testimony.
Source: Read Full Article